DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910

Made by DeepSeek. Epoch AI does not state how it can be accessed. Appears strongest at coding among the models listed here.

Find my AI Compare with another model

In short

What it does well

  • Coding: Top tier (18th of 77 listed models)

Where it falls short

  • Writing: Middle (43rd of 77 listed models)

What we don't know yet

  • Hard maths problems: Not enough data
  • School-competition maths: Not enough data
  • Graduate-level science questions: Not enough data
  • Short factual questions: Not enough data
  • Fixing real software bugs: Not enough data
  • Difficult coding tasks: Not enough data

The four ratings

  • Top tier
  • Strong
  • Middle
  • Behind the leaders
  • Not enough data

Ratings compare only the 77 models listed here, in quarters, best first. “Not enough data” means no result yet. It is never a low score.

Writing
MiddleHow often people preferred its answers to writing prompts. 1,437 on Arena's scale · Source for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 writing score (lmarena)
Coding
Top tierHow often people preferred its answers to coding questions. 1,501 on Arena's scale · Source for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 coding score (lmarena)
Maths
Not enough dataNo result yet for hard maths problems.
Knowledge
Not enough dataNo result yet for short factual questions.

Evidence completeness: Partial evidence, 7 of 13 tests have a result.

Where it is relatively stronger or weaker

This compares each kind of request with the model's own overall position among the 77 listed models, using Arena's votes. It is about performance on different languages, kinds of request and topics, not about political or social bias.

Relatively stronger

No category stands out as clearly stronger than its overall position.

Relatively weaker

Show every category we can see
Position in each Arena category
CategoryPositionArena scoreVotesSource
Expert-level prompts
Kind of request
23rd of 771,502
95% range 1,487 to 1,517
1,511Source for Expert-level prompts
Hard prompts
Kind of request
28th of 771,483
95% range 1,476 to 1,490
8,749Source for Hard prompts
Long prompts
Kind of request
30th of 771,474
95% range 1,465 to 1,482
5,880Source for Long prompts
Longer conversations
Kind of request
39th of 771,460
95% range 1,447 to 1,474
1,989Source for Longer conversations
Chinese
Language
41st of 761,502
95% range 1,483 to 1,520
1,032Source for Chinese
English prompts
Language
29th of 771,475
95% range 1,466 to 1,484
5,051Source for English prompts
French
Language
45th of 721,467
95% range 1,441 to 1,494
538Source for French
Non-English prompts
Language
35th of 771,450
95% range 1,443 to 1,457
8,602Source for Non-English prompts
Russian
Language
30th of 771,467
95% range 1,453 to 1,481
1,938Source for Russian
Spanish
Language
36th of 701,458
95% range 1,432 to 1,484
476Source for Spanish
Entertainment, sport and media
Topic
28th of 771,445
95% range 1,434 to 1,456
3,343Source for Entertainment, sport and media
Law and government
Topic
57th of 761,446
95% range 1,428 to 1,464
1,140Source for Law and government
Medicine and health
Topic
17th of 751,486
95% range 1,466 to 1,506
925Source for Medicine and health
Science
Topic
37th of 771,471
95% range 1,458 to 1,484
2,239Source for Science
Software and IT
Topic
19th of 771,496
95% range 1,487 to 1,504
5,363Source for Software and IT

Bias: what we can and can't see

Our sources do not measure political lean, stereotyping, flattery (agreeing with you too readily) or safety behaviour, so we cannot say how any model does on those. What we can show is above: where a model is relatively stronger or weaker across languages, kinds of request and topics. Also, people voting in Arena can favour answer style, such as length and formatting, and our numbers do not adjust for that. See what AI bias means and what these tests can tell you.

Best-supported use cases

Where an alternative might be more suitable

What it is

Maker
DeepSeek
Access, as listed by Epoch AI
Not stated
Licence, as listed by Arena
MIT
Last observation in our data
28 Oct 2026
Data last changed
29 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC

We have not verified an official product page for this model, so we do not link to one.

How you can use it

Open weights. Arena lists its licence as MIT. In plain terms, the model's files are published under a licence that lets others run it, so it can be offered by more than one company, sometimes at lower cost. That does not guarantee that any particular app is free. Open licences differ, and some restrict commercial use, so check the licence terms before building a business on it.

How you can reach it (an app, a website, a developer API or a third-party tool) and what that costs are not covered by our benchmark data. Where we could verify prices from the maker's own pages, they are shown under Price. See models, apps and harnesses and how AI pricing works.

Price

Price not independently verified

See DeepSeek API models and pricing (checked 29 Oct 2026). Page opened and read. It gives developer (API) prices per 1M tokens, shown on model pages. The chat app (chat.deepseek.com) goes straight to a sign-in page and we did not sign in, so we make no statement about whether it is free.

We never infer subscription prices from API prices. New to “tokens” and “per million”? See how AI pricing works.

Good to remember

  • Benchmarks are samples of tasks. None proves performance in every situation.
  • Arena scores come from people choosing between answers. That measures preference, not correctness.
  • Ratings are relative to the 77 models listed here. A different set would change them.
  • Sources test models at different settings. Each result shows the setting used, and we do not adjust it.

The evidence, for the curious

Show all 13 tests with settings and sources
All published results for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910. Ratings compare only the 77 models on this site.
TestResultRatingSetting usedSource identifierObservedLinks
Arena text: overall preference
Arena 'text' leaderboard (Bradley-Terry rating, no style control)
1,465
Arena score
95% range 1,458 to 1,471, 13,657 votes
Strong effort: Max, bradley-terry rating DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 Arena text: overall preference score (lmarena)
Arena text: creative writing
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category creative_writing
1,437
Arena score
95% range 1,425 to 1,449, 2,763 votes
Middle effort: Max, bradley-terry rating DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 Arena text: creative writing score (lmarena)
Arena text: coding
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category coding
1,501
Arena score
95% range 1,491 to 1,511, 3,745 votes
Top tier effort: Max, bradley-terry rating DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 Arena text: coding score (lmarena)
Arena text: maths
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category math
1,481
Arena score
95% range 1,460 to 1,503, 722 votes
Strong effort: Max, bradley-terry rating DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 Arena text: maths score (lmarena)
Arena text: following instructions
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category instruction_following
1,474
Arena score
95% range 1,465 to 1,483, 4,775 votes
Strong effort: Max, bradley-terry rating DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 Arena text: following instructions score (lmarena)
Arena text: business and management
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
1,462
Arena score
95% range 1,450 to 1,474, 2,402 votes
Strong effort: Max, bradley-terry rating DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 Arena text: business and management score (lmarena)
Arena WebDev: building web apps
Arena 'webdev' leaderboard (Code Arena), category overall
1,619
Arena score
95% range 1,608 to 1,630, 3,510 votes
Strong effort: Max, bradley-terry rating DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)
lmarena · webdev/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 Arena WebDev: building web apps score (lmarena)
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)Not enough data
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025Not enough data
GPQA DiamondNot enough data
SimpleQA VerifiedNot enough data
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch runs)Not enough data
FrontierCode (reported by Cognition)Not enough data

Missing evidence

Not enough data for these tests:

  • FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
  • OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
  • GPQA Diamond
  • SimpleQA Verified
  • SWE-bench Verified (Epoch runs)
  • FrontierCode (reported by Cognition)

Missing results are not low scores and do not count against the model.

Where a source gives no public run log, we cannot show the run behind the score. See data sources.

Not sure this is the right one?

Tell us what you need help with and we'll narrow the options down.

Find my AI