Muse Spark 1.1

Made by Meta, released 9 Jul 2026. Epoch AI lists its access as “API access”. Appears solid at coding and knowledge among the models listed here.

Find my AI Compare with another model

In short

What it does well

  • Coding: Strong (23rd of 77 listed models)
  • Knowledge: Strong (16th of 43 listed models)

Where it falls short

  • Writing: Middle (46th of 77 listed models)

What we don't know yet

  • Hard maths problems: Not enough data
  • School-competition maths: Not enough data
  • Graduate-level science questions: Not enough data
  • Fixing real software bugs: Not enough data
  • Difficult coding tasks: Not enough data

The four ratings

  • Top tier
  • Strong
  • Middle
  • Behind the leaders
  • Not enough data

Ratings compare only the 77 models listed here, in quarters, best first. “Not enough data” means no result yet. It is never a low score.

Writing
MiddleHow often people preferred its answers to writing prompts. 1,435 on Arena's scale · Source for Muse Spark 1.1 writing score (lmarena)
Coding
StrongHow often people preferred its answers to coding questions. 1,498 on Arena's scale · Source for Muse Spark 1.1 coding score (lmarena)
Maths
Not enough dataNo result yet for hard maths problems.
Knowledge
StrongHow many short factual questions it answered correctly. 57.8% · Source for Muse Spark 1.1 knowledge score (epoch)

Evidence completeness: Partial evidence, 8 of 13 tests have a result.

Where it is relatively stronger or weaker

This compares each kind of request with the model's own overall position among the 77 listed models, using Arena's votes. It is about performance on different languages, kinds of request and topics, not about political or social bias.

Relatively stronger

No category stands out as clearly stronger than its overall position.

Relatively weaker

Show every category we can see
Position in each Arena category
CategoryPositionArena scoreVotesSource
Expert-level prompts
Kind of request
42nd of 771,478
95% range 1,469 to 1,486
5,430Source for Expert-level prompts
Hard prompts
Kind of request
21st of 771,486
95% range 1,481 to 1,491
30,567Source for Hard prompts
Long prompts
Kind of request
40th of 771,462
95% range 1,456 to 1,467
21,310Source for Long prompts
Longer conversations
Kind of request
17th of 771,484
95% range 1,476 to 1,492
7,078Source for Longer conversations
Chinese
Language
28th of 761,515
95% range 1,505 to 1,526
3,657Source for Chinese
English prompts
Language
22nd of 771,478
95% range 1,473 to 1,483
18,732Source for English prompts
French
Language
20th of 721,492
95% range 1,476 to 1,508
1,607Source for French
German
Language
25th of 551,467
95% range 1,446 to 1,489
846Source for German
Japanese
Language
24th of 541,447
95% range 1,424 to 1,470
814Source for Japanese
Korean
Language
9th of 541,457
95% range 1,436 to 1,478
858Source for Korean
Non-English prompts
Language
19th of 771,471
95% range 1,466 to 1,476
27,621Source for Non-English prompts
Russian
Language
18th of 771,483
95% range 1,475 to 1,492
5,480Source for Russian
Spanish
Language
33rd of 701,463
95% range 1,446 to 1,479
1,474Source for Spanish
Entertainment, sport and media
Topic
35th of 771,437
95% range 1,431 to 1,444
11,845Source for Entertainment, sport and media
Law and government
Topic
25th of 761,482
95% range 1,472 to 1,492
3,962Source for Law and government
Medicine and health
Topic
21st of 751,480
95% range 1,469 to 1,491
3,389Source for Medicine and health
Science
Topic
27th of 771,483
95% range 1,476 to 1,491
7,780Source for Science
Software and IT
Topic
18th of 771,498
95% range 1,493 to 1,504
17,897Source for Software and IT

Bias: what we can and can't see

Our sources do not measure political lean, stereotyping, flattery (agreeing with you too readily) or safety behaviour, so we cannot say how any model does on those. What we can show is above: where a model is relatively stronger or weaker across languages, kinds of request and topics. Also, people voting in Arena can favour answer style, such as length and formatting, and our numbers do not adjust for that. See what AI bias means and what these tests can tell you.

Best-supported use cases

Where an alternative might be more suitable

What it is

Maker
Meta
Release date (Epoch AI)
9 Jul 2026
Access, as listed by Epoch AI
API access
Licence, as listed by Arena
Proprietary
Maker's country (Epoch AI)
United States of America
Last observation in our data
28 Oct 2026
Data last changed
29 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC

We have not verified an official product page for this model, so we do not link to one.

How you can use it

Proprietary. The model's files are not published, so it is generally available only through its maker or partners the maker chooses.

How you can reach it (an app, a website, a developer API or a third-party tool) and what that costs are not covered by our benchmark data. Where we could verify prices from the maker's own pages, they are shown under Price. Epoch AI lists access as “API access”. See models, apps and harnesses and how AI pricing works.

Price

Price not independently verified

We have not been able to check this maker's own pricing page, so we show nothing for it.

We never infer subscription prices from API prices. New to “tokens” and “per million”? See how AI pricing works.

Good to remember

  • Benchmarks are samples of tasks. None proves performance in every situation.
  • Arena scores come from people choosing between answers. That measures preference, not correctness.
  • Ratings are relative to the 77 models listed here. A different set would change them.
  • Sources test models at different settings. Each result shows the setting used, and we do not adjust it.

The evidence, for the curious

Show all 13 tests with settings and sources
All published results for Muse Spark 1.1. Ratings compare only the 77 models on this site.
TestResultRatingSetting usedSource identifierObservedLinks
Arena text: overall preference
Arena 'text' leaderboard (Bradley-Terry rating, no style control)
1,478
Arena score
95% range 1,474 to 1,482, 46,354 votes
Top tier effort: not stated, bradley-terry rating Muse Spark 1.1
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for Muse Spark 1.1 Arena text: overall preference score (lmarena)
Arena text: creative writing
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category creative_writing
1,435
Arena score
95% range 1,428 to 1,443, 9,733 votes
Middle effort: not stated, bradley-terry rating Muse Spark 1.1
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for Muse Spark 1.1 Arena text: creative writing score (lmarena)
Arena text: coding
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category coding
1,498
Arena score
95% range 1,491 to 1,504, 12,770 votes
Strong effort: not stated, bradley-terry rating Muse Spark 1.1
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for Muse Spark 1.1 Arena text: coding score (lmarena)
Arena text: maths
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category math
1,482
Arena score
95% range 1,469 to 1,495, 2,166 votes
Strong effort: not stated, bradley-terry rating Muse Spark 1.1
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for Muse Spark 1.1 Arena text: maths score (lmarena)
Arena text: following instructions
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category instruction_following
1,457
Arena score
95% range 1,451 to 1,462, 16,653 votes
Strong effort: not stated, bradley-terry rating Muse Spark 1.1
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for Muse Spark 1.1 Arena text: following instructions score (lmarena)
Arena text: business and management
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
1,470
Arena score
95% range 1,463 to 1,478, 8,796 votes
Top tier effort: not stated, bradley-terry rating Muse Spark 1.1
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for Muse Spark 1.1 Arena text: business and management score (lmarena)
Arena WebDev: building web apps
Arena 'webdev' leaderboard (Code Arena), category overall
1,542
Arena score
95% range 1,535 to 1,550, 7,935 votes
Middle effort: not stated, bradley-terry rating Muse Spark 1.1
lmarena · webdev/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for Muse Spark 1.1 Arena WebDev: building web apps score (lmarena)
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)Not enough data
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025Not enough data
GPQA DiamondNot enough data
SimpleQA Verified
SimpleQA Verified, benchmark released 2025-09-09
57.8%
share of questions correct
standard error ±1.6 points
Strong effort: not stated, best score across scorers muse-spark-1.1
epoch · simpleqa_verified.csv
31 Aug 2026 Source for Muse Spark 1.1 SimpleQA Verified score (epoch) · Run details for SimpleQA Verified
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch runs)Not enough data
FrontierCode (reported by Cognition)Not enough data

Missing evidence

Not enough data for these tests:

  • FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
  • OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
  • GPQA Diamond
  • SWE-bench Verified (Epoch runs)
  • FrontierCode (reported by Cognition)

Missing results are not low scores and do not count against the model.

Where a source gives no public run log, we cannot show the run behind the score. See data sources.

Not sure this is the right one?

Tell us what you need help with and we'll narrow the options down.

Find my AI